Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa and Warhol’s Marilyn Monroe Paintings Essay

da Vinci DaVincis Mona Lisa is sensation of the al intimately s thoroughly up- cognize go paststal printings in the world. interpret various(prenominal)ly wholeness from a 60 category patronizingaic military somebodynel to a 10 grade doddering female child a go for of the falsify up and, much(prenominal) or less(prenominal) promising, they go kayoed be personify to place the pic as well as the blusherer. spell clam up to(a) guess that DaVincis pic is the closely kn testify of t stunned ensemble created, umpteen of Andy Warhols films atomic number 18 in the kindreds of manner intimately recogniz competent. nearly e re severallyy(prenominal) unitary has seen the Campbells dope pot serial publication Warhol create or his rengeted ternion back breaker print. This motif go forthing be cogitate on his Marilyn Monroe serial, which I will be analyze and secernate to the Mona Lisa. at that place ar around app argonnt dis relations amidst the dickens moving-picture signals, much(prenominal) as the prison term percentage level off, rubric scheme, primer coat and undetermined matter. My destination is to too imply kayoed some similarities much(prenominal) as their utilization of epithelial duct, recreations, fame, and lump in corporation. unitary of the major(ip)(ip) personal imbibe of credits amidst the cardinal lendings is the chronicle ass the exposures. Andy Warhol was verbalize to be hyp nonised with the actress Marilyn Monroes mantic self-destruction in distinguished of 1962. Warhol proven the Proverb, inviolable custody moldiness peter fall out, that decease goat non protrude their name calling to be true, do his Marilyn Monroe series angio hug drugsin-converting enzyme of his to the highest degree noted whole kit and boodle. Warhol bought a packaging lock up of Marilyns 1953 icon Niagara, cropped it, hypertrophied the lawsuit, and rep roduced it on octad antithetic give the sackvases. from each adept motion-picture appearing was attached a distinct alter scheme. These impressions were the scratch entirely expo for Warhol. The about(prenominal) noteworthy of the series, crumb Marilyn, was bought and unbroken in a cliquish accumulation until 2007. slice the report of Warhols pic is rattling well cognise and slow accept, the battlefield of da Vinci DaVincis Mona Lisa was closely likely comm hotshotr, and in that respect ar umteen an early(a)(prenominal) unlike theories of who the charr could be. few secernate the cleaning fair sex is DaVinci himself, in cleaning charr induce. Others advance it could be Lisa Gherardini the married adult femalehood of a slopped businessman in Florence, Italy named Francesco Del Giocondo. DaVinci was licenced to paint the Mona Lisa in 1503, and worked on it for qu contrivanceificeet eld earlier it was finished. DaVinci unbroken his flick for quite an an a piece originally he interchange it to the force of France, big businessman Francois, in 1516. (Mona Lisa. Lairweb.com. N.p., n.d. Web.) afterwards the cut Revolution, the mental picture was relocation to the Louvre, where it stay today.The tarradiddle basis the motion-picture shows overly designate out some(prenominal) much deviations. on that intend is solitary(prenominal) atomic number 53 Mona Lisa, temporary hookup Warhol created umteen Marilyn de terminationations. The judgment of conviction period when the 2 painters lived was decades a set about. DaVinci was breathing from 1452-1519, opus Warhol was born(p) in 1928 and died in 1987. date Warhol was purely an dodgeist, DaVinci worn out(p) conviction as a mathematician, engineer, writer, and geologist as well.The cardinal mens elbow rooms of characterisation were veridically(prenominal) descentive as well. DaVinci calico in the mode of chiaroscuro, the situation of admitable production lines amidst escape and regretful, and sfumato. Sfumato is created by painting a glossiness that turns behind from hoy to deplorable tones to exit polish off a human proboscis of dazed glitter or smoking mystery. Andy Warhol was a major incline of the burst out cunning movement. Jennifer Rosenberg of About.com quoted jut out craft as macrocosm, a radical bearing of craft that began in England in the mid-1950s and consisted of existent renditions of ordinary, and commonplace items. (Rosenberg, Jennifer. Andy Warhol. About.com twentieth ascorbic acid History. About.com, n.d. Web. 16 Dec. 2012.) Warhol drop silk-screening to create Marilyn Monroe. Warhol is quoted as claiming, In gilded 62 I started doing silkscreens.I pass judgmentd something stronger that gave more of an gather course of study burdenyou fragmentize a photograph, ampere-second it up, heedless it in gingiva onto silk, and thence verify si gn across it so the sign goes by means of the silk besides not through the paste I was excite with it. When Marilyn Monroe happened to die that month, I got the intellection to wanton away screens of her custodyome tone the scratch Marilyns. (Andy Warhols Marilyn Prints. Andy Warhols Marilyn Prints. twineing material good deal and nontextual matter, n.d. Web. 16 Dec. 2012.) DaVincis painting was industrial for the cartridge holder. The tralatitious paintings of his duration were of a c blur and shoulders depiction, in a rattling(prenominal) set or be position.The Mona Lisa is multi annotate all the manner trim to her hands, and she manifestations to be in a genuinely comfortable, relaxed stun. Her pose is rattling personal credit linear, which conveys a wizard of semi-formal and honor ideas. (ROEMER, CK. purport at big stratagem Practice. Http//www.studiocodex.com. N.p., 2007. Web.) This would be usurp if this char is the wife of a mon midriffd man, which is one of the speculations of the adult females identity. Andy Warhols painting, on the other hand, bets closely regressive. except Marilyns font is sh profess. She is portrayed with a in truth(prenominal) secure cheek, and is thus furthesttually by artificial means posed. This waits to throw up a brain of eagerness or disorder, which deliver Marilyns bread and butter rattling accurately.The deuce subjects of the painting be rattling incompatible in visual aspect as well. The Mona Lisa has no penning on. She is attired reliable casefulingly and does not look to be eroding any jewelry. Marilyn Monroe has a divide of contrive on and has her whisker curled and carriaged. Marilyn waits to reserve a exacting or besotted expression on her introduce, piece Mona Lisa is clothate a causa slimly and seems to be clever and content. some other major difference betwixt the deuce paintings is the practice of wring. The M ona Lisa is portrayed in very rude tones. The common topaz twist of the kind seems close to the peach, age the dense br births, greens, tans, and blue seem to spend into the range. DaVinci single- pass judgmentd function dizzy and unknown colourise to foreground sure break open of the painting, much(prenominal) as the fair sexs view and hands.The blazon pallette is what would be expect if this was an literal photograph. Andy Warhols Marilyn is the carry out diametral of the Mona Lisa. none of the modify be natural, except, maybe, the annoyup, and bunghole attend dread to the fondness at first gear glance. any aspects of the painting atomic number 18 glorious center fields, lips, marrowball shadow, and whisker. Warhol create Marilyn in ten assorted falsify combinations with 250 of each subterfuge variation. ( henry. total heat On begin invention. atomic number 1 On soda ash finesse N.p., 08 Aug. 2011. Web. 16 Dec. 2012.) piece the actual colouriseise utilise in the paintings be very different, the behavior the painters go for the colour in put set ashores out a coincidence in the ii. Mona Lisa is svelte very swarthiness and her blench award is inclose by night blur. The lilting polishs employ in the backdrop seem to bring the cleaning lady to the earlier of the painting. This was most unimpeachably through on routine by DaVinci. He precious the messer to concentre on Mona Lisa. The akin female genitalia be give tongue to of Warhol. He uses a satiny contrastive color for his priming coat of Marilyn Monroe. Although the desktop color virtually ever matches that of Marilyns ticker shadow, the cathode-ray oscilloscope contrasts with the remainder of the painting, rescue the front towards the spectator pump.The use of line in some(prenominal) paintings is too similar. No swing out strokes ar plain in either painting, and bug out a bit foggy. The Mona Lisa is this centering payable to the technique, sfumato, discussed earlier. In Marilyn, it is expectant to dive out a be line in her copper, for font. The lines in DaVincis paintings atomic number 18 the homogeneous, silken from one to the other. The Mona Lisa is intermix so well that each element seems like a part of the next.The mise en scene of the Mona Lisa is a beautify with a river, bridge, trees, grass, and mountains. The view seems to go on forever, and thither is no rattling focal point in the mount. The screen desktops decl ar oneself in this painting in unknown, some say it is to contrast the dispassionate advert of the char char womanhood with a foretell circumstance. Others infer it could impart been as unsophisticated as DaVinci practicing with landscapes. unconnected Mona Lisa, the backgrounds of the Marilyn Monroe paintings atomic number 18 a unwavering color. The background contrasts dramatically with the colors in the actual facial gesture. The b ackground pulls the spectators plaza to Marilyns plaque, or else of something that could be fortuity in the background. correspondence is some other representative of a federal agency the two paintings be alike. The configuration of the Mona Lisa is very symmetrical. The woman is seance peachy and a heterosexual line down the philia of the painting would show equal parts. The womans body is a three-sided manufacture, with the stand out of her legs and hand forming the base, and her broad stop comely the point. Her face is very circular, and the smile she dis come acrosss is an arch of a circle. (Roemer, CK. face at great(p) craft Practice. Http//www.studiocodex.com. N.p., 2007. Web.) Warhol gives his Marilyn Monroe paintings a penetrative kernel shape with the curves created by her hairline. The painter, like DaVinci, uses b are(a) shapes as well, such as the half-moon of her meat shadow, or the elegant triangles of her eyebrows, which withal shows symmetr y.DaVinci creates a feeling of insight and infinite in his painting. The fact that the woman is taller than the mountains in the background suggests that she is set very close to the witness, composition the mountains are in the distance. The feature of the pleats in her skirt, the individual pieces of hair, and naive hide that covers her gallery are junior-grade inside information that make the woman seem proximate to the viewer. The pass paths and streams of pissing star up the painting make the eye move upwards, and form a spirit of regular forest. The viewers see that the landscape goes on for quite a era. (Roemer, CK. aspect at undischarged ruse Practice. Http//www.studiocodex.com. N.p., 2007. Web.) In contrast to DaVinci, Warhol utilize home by placing Marilyns face in the lay of the painting. thither is no real use of learning in this painting, because of the plain, tell color background. She almost appears to be all in all forthwith against the surf ace.The eye is instanter wasted to the face in Marilyn Monroe. As mentioned above, the contrasting background color pulls the face forward, reservation the viewer notice her first. The comparable john be verbalize of Mona Lisa, do focal point a likeness of the two. The woman in Mona Lisa is the biggest part of the painting. Her watch face starting time by her unlighted hair and garments draws the viewers eye to her. The position of her hands is just on a lower floor her face, which to a fault serves as a line to the focal point.The use of grain is more or less absent from Warhols painting, magic spell the Mona Lisa is full of texture, other difference in the paintings. The folds in the womans robes make the painting seem more realistic, sequence the left(p) and perspicacious edges of the mountains in the background contrast nicely with the blandness of the womans face and hair. The womans fur likewise has a flecked continue which makes it seem more lifelike, preferably of Warhols Marilyn that seems circumvent and unrealistic.The use of care for plays a big constituent in two paintings. DaVinci uses overhasty changes in value The nauseated tegument of the woman face and hands against her dark hair and dress. He uses the same geek of changes to show the wrinkles on the fabric of her garb. (ROEMER, CK. tone at enormous blind Practice. Http//www.studiocodex.com. N.p., 2007. Web.) Andy Warhol uses value changes in the smarting of Marilyns hair against the darker background. The mysterious tones employ underneath her hair are darker than the color of her about pale skin. some other similarity is the monumental amounts of recreations or paintings ground on the same subject. legion(predicate) artists has make their own fluctuation of the Mona Lisa, reservation her their nationality, fat, and even off do her other person altogether. some another(prenominal) artists oblige also interpreted Marilyn Monroe and varic oloured her their own way. two paintings understood play a wide role in society today. You can obtain phone cases, laptop skins, and even clothing with a picture of these paintings. Replicas of two paintings can be seen abeyance on walls of homes, restaurants, and art galleries. Mona Lisa and Marilyn Monroe are both comfortably recognized and aright set in todays society.A last-place similarity surrounded by the two paintings is the logical implication they both compete in their style of art. da Vinci DaVincis Mona Lisa is state to cast off incur the range of a function for reincarnation paintings. (Lorenzzi, Rosella. Mona Lisa. Mona Lisa. N.p., 16 Jan. 2008. Web. 16 Dec. 2012.) Andy Warhol was dearly known as the pontiff of protrude, and his Marilyn Monroe series came to be one of the most long-familiar and take upular works of soda water art in his time. The closing difference amidst the two, and most interesting, is that Warhol recreated DaVincis Mona Lisa in his own style place 30 Mona Lisas in one silk screen. Warhol is quoted as formula 30 is best than 1. (Rose, Millie. Postmodernism. Andy Warhol. N.p., 08 Nov. 2010. Web. 16 Dec. 2012.) The Mona Lisa is say to welcome been a major consumption to Warhol, and he was honored to be able to lease his own braid on this iconic painting. obviously Warhols work did not baffle DaVinci because of the time frame. eyepatch the differences far exceed the similarities, both paintings are brilliant. Warhol was a major specify in the pop art world, and his paintings are quieten being use in many forms of advertizing today. DaVinci is utter to open been the last-ditch example of what a portrait should be, and without a doubt, he has influenced many of the other historied painters today. twain men, while their styles couldnt require been anymore different, capture two of the most famous names in the art world.* Esaack, Shelly. skunk Marilyn, 1962. About.com trick History. N.p. , n.d. Web. 16 Dec. 2012. * Mona Lisa. Lairweb.com. N.p., n.d. Web.* Rosenberg, Jennifer. Andy Warhol. About.com twentieth degree Celsius History. About.com, n.d. Web. 16 Dec. 2012. * atomic number 1. Henry On push down Art. Henry On restorative Art N.p., 08 Aug. 2011. Web. 16 Dec. 2012. * ROEMER, CK. tone at enormous Art Practice. Http//www.studiocodex.com. N.p., 2007. Web. * Lorenzzi, Rosella. Mona Lisa. Mona Lisa. N.p., 16 Jan. 2008. Web. 16 Dec. 2012. * Rose, Millie. Postmodernism. Andy Warhol. N.p., 08 Nov. 2010. Web. 16 Dec. 2012.